Additional resources for the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines resources.

Table 5.2

Table 5.2 Vulnerability classes for surface drinking water sources
Source water category based on vulnerability classificationSource of microbial riskFactors influencing vulnerability to microbial risk:Overall assessment: important characteristics of a water source in this class
Intensity of hazard/ hazardous eventProximity to offtakeProtection measures

Vulnerability 
Class 1

Fully protected catchment and large storage reservoir (1)

(> I GL)

Human habitation

Negligible or preferably none.

No sewage treatment plants.

No on-site sewage management systems within the protected part of the catchment.

Formal human settlements and/or public access (including for recreational activities) are excluded from the catchment area of the reservoir/river, and the reservoir itself.

Natural bushland protection is supported by enforced regulation and land planning controls.

Proactive surveillance and management regime to reduce impact of feral animals (where practical).

Low intensity/low risk activities may be allowed in the outer catchment, but active source protection (e.g. ranger surveillance) is practised to ensure negligible contamination risk.

Supply is drawn from a large reservoir.(1)

The catchment area for the source water is essentially free of humans or ruminant livestock as sources of enteric pathogens (including protozoa, viruses and bacteria).

Sources of microbial contaminants include birds (e.g. water fowl) and native and feral animals (predominantly although not exclusively enteric bacteria).

The risks from these contaminants can be mitigated by storing the source water in a large raw water storage reservoir, which allows time for die off and/or settling.

The turbidity of the source water is low enough at the offtake point that it does not compromise effective disinfection.(3)

Public access, such as for recreational activities

Negligible or preferably none.

No activities involving primary or secondary water contact.

 
Stock animals

Negligible stock animal populations.

No farms.

Limited (monitored and controlled) populations of feral animals.

 

Vulnerability 
Class 2

Moderately protected catchment with well protected inner catchment

OR

Protected catchment with run of river extraction

OR

with storage reservoirs that hold >1 GL (or more than one year's annual flow)

Public access, such as recreational activities

Stock animals

 

Human habitation

Minimal.

No sewage treatment plants.

Low density rural developments with well-managed on-site sewage management systems.

Human settlements are excluded from inner catchment area.(2)

Active source protection (e.g. ranger surveillance) is practiced to minimise contamination risk.

Stock are fully fenced out of main feeder streams to the reservoir, and these streams are lined with vegetated buffer zones.

Natural bushland inner catchment area, low-density rural outer catchment area. Protection supported by enforced regulation in the inner catchment area.

Supply may be from a large or small reservoir or run of the river.(1)

The catchment area for the source water has minimal sources of enteric pathogens derived from humans or livestock (including protozoa, viruses and bacteria).

Higher concentrations of indicator bacteria than a Category 1 source water are likely to be observed at the offtake point because of:

  • the absence of a large raw water storage reservoir (in some cases) that would assist with the die off and/or settling of any pathogens that may be present
  • some minor sources of human habitation (e.g. rural subdivisions) and livestock contamination are present in remote parts of the catchment, but they are sufficiently distant from the offtake point, or are well buffered by the presence of riparian vegetation, to not present a major microbial risk.
Public access, such as for recreational activities

Land-based public access such as for recreation (camping, biking, four-wheel driving).

Primary and secondary water contact activities.

All public access (including for recreational activities) excluded from the inner catchment area.(2)
Stock animals

Low population size and density.

No sources of intensive animal husbandry (e.g. diaries, feedlots, piggeries).

All types of farming are excluded from the inner catchment area.(2)

Vulnerability 
Class 3

Poorly protected
outer catchment
with moderate
protection of the
inner catchment

Public access,
such as for
recreational
activities

Stock animals

Human habitation

Moderate population size and density.

May include limited sewered urban areas and sewage treatment plants within the outer catchment area.

Medium density rural development in outer catchment, possibly including some limited areas of urban development (e.g. small towns, satellite suburbs).

Human settlements excluded from inner catchment area.

Limited catchment management interventions (e.g. stream fencing, on-site sewage management system inspection and maintenance programs, stream frontage riparian buffers, planning overlays and other planning controls). 

Source protection supported by active surveillance in the inner catchment area.

Major sewer overflows or sewage treatment plants failures into source water are reportable to the downstream water treatment plant operator.

Supply may be from a large or small reservoir or be run of the river.(1)

The catchment area for the source water has multiple sources of faecal contamination from humans (e.g. urban subdivisions, contributing stormwater runoff, or through the presence of onsite wastewater treatment systems) and livestock are present in a large proportion of the outer catchment and may have access to main feeder streams.

The inner catchment area, and any raw water storage that may be present, are protected from faecal contamination.

Public access, such as for recreational activities

Moderate level of land-based public access such as for recreation (camping, biking, four wheel driving).

Secondary and primary water contact activities.

No recreational activity allowed on the main reservoir.
Stock animalsNo sources of intensive animal husbandry (e.g. dairies, feedlots, piggeries).Farming excluded from inner catchment.

Vulnerability 
Class 4

Unprotected catchment

OR

Moderately protected and poorly protected catchments with no protected inner catchment

Public access,
such as for
recreational
activities

Stock animals

Human habitation

High density urban areas and large population size (e.g. large towns, suburbs).

Includes sewered urban areas and sewage treatment plants within the catchment area

No exclusion zone in catchment area.

Limited management interventions in the outer and inner catchment areas (2) (e.g. stream fencing, on-site sewage management system inspection and maintenance programs, stream frontage riparian buffers, and planning controls.)

Major sewer overflows or sewage treatment plant failures into source water are reportable to the downstream water treatment plant operator.

Supply may be sourced from a large or small reservoir or run of the river.(1)

The catchment area for the source water has multiple sources of faecal contamination from both human and agricultural activities.

The inner catchment area is not protected and recreational activities (primary or secondary water contact) are permitted throughout the catchment or on any raw water storage that may be present.

There are limited protection measures applied.

Public access, such as for recreational activities

Land-based public access such as for recreation (camping, biking, four-wheel driving) in both the outer and inner catchment(2) (away from urban developments).

May include water-based recreation on reservoirs.

Stock animals

Potentially high densities in both outer and inner catchment areas(2) (away from urban developments).

There are sources of intensive animal husbandry (e.g. dairies, feedlots, piggeries) within the catchment area.

(1) A large reservoir provides a storage barrier sufficient to achieve a several log10 reduction in pathogens as a result of settling, natural die off and dilution. Typically, this means the full storage volume of the reservoir is around 1 gigalitre (GL) and has a volume of at least the annual streamflow. Run of the river means water is drawn directly from a river prior to treatment.

(2) Terminology can vary, e.g. inner catchments can also be called “reservoir protection zones”. The demarcation between inner catchment and outer catchment varies. Typical surface water inner catchment reservoir protection zones, including feeder streams, within Australia are 2 to 3 km from reservoir highwater level.

(3) Refer to the Part IV information sheets for more information on turbidity limits for the different methods of disinfection.


Table 5.6

Table 5.6 Indicative pathogen LRV potentially attributable to treatment barriers
Treatment barriersValidated LRVs1Basis for validation
ProtozoaVirusBacteria
Conventional filtration: Coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation (or dissolved air flotation) and media filtration2.5-422

Accepted industry norms.2

Performance depends on design, management and operational effectiveness and good supporting practices. On-line monitoring of filtered water turbidities; maintaining turbidities below defined critical limits measured by nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) (e.g. <0.2 NTU); minimising turbidity spikes and controlling filter backwash and recycling procedures are consistent with achieving higher LRVs.

Lack of sedimentation in direct filtration reduces maximum removals by 0.5-1 LRV.

Direct filtration: Coagulation, flocculation and media filtration2-3.511
Microfiltration or ultrafiltration (MF/UF)404

Published validation protocol.3

Maintaining individual filter turbidities below defined critical limits (e.g. ≤ 0.1 NTU).

Daily Membrane Integrity Test (MIT) to manufacturer’s specification for the required LRV.

UF typically achieves higher LRVs.

Chlorine044

Published inactivation data and validation protocol.4

Virus
C.t99.99 6 mg.min/L at pH 7, 10°C, turbidity <2 NTU5
C.t99.99 16 mg.min/L at pH 8, 10°C and turbidity <2 NTU5

Bacteria
C.t99.99 <1 mg.min/L at pH 6-9, 10°C-15°C, and turbidity ≤1NTU.5

For bacteria and viruses, a default of 15 mg.min/L is given as an acceptable value in the Guidelines

(See also Information Sheet 1.3).

Chloramine044

Published inactivation data.6

Virus
C.t99.99 3100 mg.min/L at pH 7, 10°C, turbidity ≤2NTU5
C.t99.99 3970 mg.min/L at pH 8, 10°C, turbidity ≤2NTU5
C.t99.99 6870 mg.min/L at pH 9, 10°C, turbidity ≤2NTU5

Bacteria
C.t99.99 360 mg.min/L at pH 8-9, ≥5°C, turbidity ≤1NTU5

(See also Information Sheet 1.4).

Ultraviolet light disinfection (UV)444

Published inactivation data and validation protocol.7

UV dose of 186 mJ/cm2 can provide 4 log inactivation of viruses and 22 mJ/cm2 can provide 4 log inactivation of protozoa and bacteria.

(See also Information Sheet 1.7)

Ozone444

Published inactivation data and validation protocol.8

Virus
C.t99.99 ≥1.2 mg.min/L at pH 6-9, ≥5°C, turbidity ≤1NTU

Protozoa5
C.t99.99 ≥64 mg.min/L at pH 6-9, ≥5°C, turbidity ≤1NTU

Bacteria5
C.t99.99 ≥0.04 mg.min/L at pH 6-9, ≥5°C, turbidity ≤1NTU5

(See also Information Sheet 1.6)

Reverse osmosis (RO)

 

 

1.5-2

2.5-4

 

 

1.5-2

2.5-4

 

 

1.5-2

2.5-4

Published validation protocol.9

Validated LRVs limited by sensitivity of operational monitoring.

Based on on-line operational monitoring of EC or TOC.

Based on on-line or off-line operational monitoring of sulphate or fluorescent dyes.

1 LRVs can only be claimed if meeting requirements described in published material or by certification against validation protocols (as cited for individual processes) (see Chapter 9 and Victorian Department of Health 2013).

2 USEPA 2006 (also see Turbidity Fact Sheet).

3 USEPA 2005.

4 Keegan et al. 2012 (see Information Sheet 1.3 “Disinfection with Chlorine”); WaterVal 2017a.

5 Concentration (C) and the corresponding disinfectant contact time (t) in minutes (C.t).

6 Keegan et al. 2012 (see Information Sheet 1.4 “Chloramines”).

7 (see Information Sheet 1.7 “Disinfection with Ultraviolet Light”); WaterVal 2017b.

8 (see Information Sheet 1.6 “Disinfection with Ozone”); Waterval 2017c.

9 Waterval 2017d.


Table 8.4

Table 8.4 Recommended maximum impurity concentrations for selected drinking water treatment chemicals
 IMPURITYAntimonyArsenicBariumCadmiumChromiumCopperCyanideFluorideLeadMercuryNickelSeleniumSilver
NHMRC Health-Based Guideline Value (mg/L)0.0030.0120.0020.0520.081.50.010.0010.020.010.1
Treatment Chemical*Chemical Strength (%)Example doses (mg/L)             
Aluminium chlorohydrate23100 (as Al2O3)0.72.31610.511.5460 3452.30.24.62.323
Aluminium sulfate (Alum)4720 (as Al2(SO4)3)7.123.616454.7117.54700 352523.52.44723.5235
Aluminium sulfate (Alum)4760 (as Al2(SO4)3)2.47.95481.639.21567 11757.80.815.77.878
Aluminium sulfate (Alum)47120 (as Al2(SO4)3)1.23.92740.819.6783 5883.90.47.83.939
Calcium hydroxide9930 (as Ca(OH)2) 33.023106.6165  4950333.36633330
Calcium hypochlorite653 (as Cl2) 217.01516743.31083.3  32500216.721.7433.3216.72167
Calcium oxide10500 (as CaO) 0.1140.041  300.20.020.40.22
Chlorine1003 (as Cl2) 333.3      333.333.3   
Copper sulfate25.51 (as CuSO4.5H2O) 255.0      255 510  
Ferric chloride42120 (as FeCl3)1.13.6 0.717.570028 3.50.473.535
Ferric sulfate20100 (as Fe2(SO4)3)0.62.0 0.4140016 20.24220
Hydrochloric acid335 (as HCl)19.8  13.2330   66 132  
Hydrofluorosilicic acid161.5 (as F) 107.0 21.3    106.7    
Hydroxylated ferric sulfate12.51000.41.3 0.36.325010 1.30.12.51.313
Polyaluminium chloride10100 (as Al2O3)0.31.0700.25200 15010.12.0110
Potassium permanganate991 (as KMnO4)   1984950    99   
Sodium fluoride451.5 (as F)90  60    300    
Sodium Fluorosilicate601.5 (as F)120  80         
Sodium hydroxide5010 (as NaOH)15  10250   505100  
Sodium hypochlorite123 (as Cl2)   8     480  
Sulfuric acid985 (as H2SO4 )58.8196.01372039.298039200 2940019619.6 196 

* Table includes recommended maximum impurity concentrations (RMIC) for selected drinking water chemicals. Further information on determining RMIC can be found in Box 8.3.


Table 9.3 Example of chlorination as a critical control point

Hazards

Enteric bacteria, viruses and Giardia

Process controls

  • Chlorine dosing system
  • Plant flow rate / operation of clear well storage
  • pH adjustment
  • Chlorine cylinder changeover
  • Backup power / duplicate facilities

Operational monitoring

CharacteristicTarget CriteriaCritical limitsMonitoring Methods
Chlorine residual> 0.5 mg/LSpecific low chlorine residual set to achieve a minimum C.t requirement based on maximum flow and minimum storage times. Time is an important factor in determining the critical limit e.g. if there is a filtered water storage prior to supply to customers an interruption to chlorination of up to several hours may not result in the C.t value falling below the minimum limit.

Online, continuous chlorine residual analyser, flow and pH

24-hour monitored alarms on residual monitoring, pH and chlorine dosing equipment

Regular turbidity and temperature monitoring, and chlorine demand calculations. Increase frequency on changing water quality

Appropriate electronic or hard copy monitoring records

pHpH 6.5-7.5
Flow rateSet to achieve minimum contact time
Chlorine doseSet points ± x%
Turbidity< 1.0 NTU
Temperature 

Corrective action

Any breach in critical limits or target criteria should result in any of the following operating procedures as necessary:

  • inspect and calibrate equipment
  • adjust flow rate
  • adjust chlorine dose or feed point
  • carry out additional monitoring, increase sampling and testing
  • recalculate C.t values
  • implement unplanned maintenance procedure
  • secondary or booster disinfection
  • use alternative supply or divert water
  • engage backup equipment
  • plant automatic shutdown
  • implement emergency response
  • record actions to be taken and report (internally or externally as required).

Verification

  • Calibration and maintenance of equipment
  • Drinking water quality monitoring
  • Consumer satisfaction
  • Evaluation and audit

 


Table A1.9

Table A1.9 Example preventive measures and potential critical control points for Giardia — river system
 Potential sources of Giardia Preventative measures Potential critical control pointsa

River/weir

Example of long-arrow-down at 6x

Septic tank effluent

Installation, design and maintenance standards

Setback distances

 
Livestock waste

Riparian zones

Stocking rate controls

Stream fences
 

 

Flow diversion from reservoir of highly contaminated first-flush water following heavy rainfall

 

 

 

 

 

Flow diversion

Reservoir

Human or livestock access

Restrict access

Fencing

Interception drains

Detention

 

Treatment plant

 

Coagulation

Sedimentation

Filtration

 

 

Filtration

Treatment plant

 Disinfection, automatic dosing and monitoringDisinfection

Distribution system

Cross-connections / backflows

Mains breaks / new mains

Booster chlorination

Cross-connection control

Positive pressure

Maintenance and repair protocols and procedures

 

(one or more of the preventive
measures)

a Determined using the critical control point decision tree

Table A1.11 Chlorination as a critical control point

Hazards

Enteric bacteria, viruses and Giardia

Process controls

  • Chlorine dosing system
  • Plant flow rate / operation of clear well storage
  • pH adjustment
  • Chlorine cylinder changeover
  • Backup power / duplicate facilities

Operational monitoring

ParameterTarget CriteriaCritical limitsMonitoring Methods
Chlorine residual> 0.5 mg/LSpecific low chlorine residual set to achieve a minimum C.t requirement based on maximum flow and minimum storage times. Time is an important factor in determining the critical limit e.g. if there is a filtered water storage prior to supply to customers an interruption to chlorination of up to several hours may not result in the C.t value falling below the minimum limit.

Online, continuous chlorine residual analyser, flow and pH

24-hour monitored alarms on residual monitoring, pH and chlorine dosing equipment

Regular turbidity and temperature monitoring, and chlorine demand calculations. Increase frequency on changing water quality

Appropriate electronic or hard copy monitoring records

pHpH 6.5-7.5
Flow rateSet to achieve minimum contact time
Chlorine doseSet points ± x%
Turbidity< 1.0 NTU
TemperatureTemperature will influence the required C.ta.

a WaterVal 2017

Corrective action

Any breach in critical limits or target criteria should result in any of the following operating procedures as necessary:

  • inspect and calibrate equipment
  • adjust flow rate
  • adjust chlorine dose or feed point
  • carry out additional monitoring, increase sampling and testing
  • recalculate C.t values
  • implement unplanned maintenance procedure
  • secondary or booster disinfection
  • use alternative supply or divert water
  • engage backup equipment
  • plant automatic shutdown
  • implement emergency response
  • record actions to be taken and report (internally or externally as required).

Verification

  • Calibration and maintenance of equipment
  • Drinking water quality monitoring
  • Consumer satisfaction
  • Evaluation and audit