Additional resources for the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines resources.
Table 5.2
Source water category based on vulnerability classification | Source of microbial risk | Factors influencing vulnerability to microbial risk: | Overall assessment: important characteristics of a water source in this class | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intensity of hazard/ hazardous event | Proximity to offtake | Protection measures | |||
Vulnerability Fully protected catchment and large storage reservoir (1) (> I GL) | Human habitation | Negligible or preferably none. No sewage treatment plants. No on-site sewage management systems within the protected part of the catchment. | Formal human settlements and/or public access (including for recreational activities) are excluded from the catchment area of the reservoir/river, and the reservoir itself. | Natural bushland protection is supported by enforced regulation and land planning controls. Proactive surveillance and management regime to reduce impact of feral animals (where practical). Low intensity/low risk activities may be allowed in the outer catchment, but active source protection (e.g. ranger surveillance) is practised to ensure negligible contamination risk. Supply is drawn from a large reservoir.(1) | The catchment area for the source water is essentially free of humans or ruminant livestock as sources of enteric pathogens (including protozoa, viruses and bacteria). Sources of microbial contaminants include birds (e.g. water fowl) and native and feral animals (predominantly although not exclusively enteric bacteria). The risks from these contaminants can be mitigated by storing the source water in a large raw water storage reservoir, which allows time for die off and/or settling. The turbidity of the source water is low enough at the offtake point that it does not compromise effective disinfection.(3) |
Public access, such as for recreational activities | Negligible or preferably none. No activities involving primary or secondary water contact. | ||||
Stock animals | Negligible stock animal populations. No farms. Limited (monitored and controlled) populations of feral animals. | ||||
Vulnerability Moderately protected catchment with well protected inner catchment OR Protected catchment with run of river extraction OR with storage reservoirs that hold >1 GL (or more than one year's annual flow) Public access, such as recreational activities Stock animals
| Human habitation | Minimal. No sewage treatment plants. Low density rural developments with well-managed on-site sewage management systems. | Human settlements are excluded from inner catchment area.(2) | Active source protection (e.g. ranger surveillance) is practiced to minimise contamination risk. Stock are fully fenced out of main feeder streams to the reservoir, and these streams are lined with vegetated buffer zones. Natural bushland inner catchment area, low-density rural outer catchment area. Protection supported by enforced regulation in the inner catchment area. Supply may be from a large or small reservoir or run of the river.(1) | The catchment area for the source water has minimal sources of enteric pathogens derived from humans or livestock (including protozoa, viruses and bacteria). Higher concentrations of indicator bacteria than a Category 1 source water are likely to be observed at the offtake point because of:
|
Public access, such as for recreational activities | Land-based public access such as for recreation (camping, biking, four-wheel driving). Primary and secondary water contact activities. | All public access (including for recreational activities) excluded from the inner catchment area.(2) | |||
Stock animals | Low population size and density. No sources of intensive animal husbandry (e.g. diaries, feedlots, piggeries). | All types of farming are excluded from the inner catchment area.(2) | |||
Vulnerability Poorly protected Public access, Stock animals | Human habitation | Moderate population size and density. May include limited sewered urban areas and sewage treatment plants within the outer catchment area. | Medium density rural development in outer catchment, possibly including some limited areas of urban development (e.g. small towns, satellite suburbs). Human settlements excluded from inner catchment area. | Limited catchment management interventions (e.g. stream fencing, on-site sewage management system inspection and maintenance programs, stream frontage riparian buffers, planning overlays and other planning controls). Source protection supported by active surveillance in the inner catchment area. Major sewer overflows or sewage treatment plants failures into source water are reportable to the downstream water treatment plant operator. Supply may be from a large or small reservoir or be run of the river.(1) | The catchment area for the source water has multiple sources of faecal contamination from humans (e.g. urban subdivisions, contributing stormwater runoff, or through the presence of onsite wastewater treatment systems) and livestock are present in a large proportion of the outer catchment and may have access to main feeder streams. The inner catchment area, and any raw water storage that may be present, are protected from faecal contamination. |
Public access, such as for recreational activities | Moderate level of land-based public access such as for recreation (camping, biking, four wheel driving). Secondary and primary water contact activities. | No recreational activity allowed on the main reservoir. | |||
Stock animals | No sources of intensive animal husbandry (e.g. dairies, feedlots, piggeries). | Farming excluded from inner catchment. | |||
Vulnerability Unprotected catchment OR Moderately protected and poorly protected catchments with no protected inner catchment Public access, Stock animals | Human habitation | High density urban areas and large population size (e.g. large towns, suburbs). Includes sewered urban areas and sewage treatment plants within the catchment area | No exclusion zone in catchment area. | Limited management interventions in the outer and inner catchment areas (2) (e.g. stream fencing, on-site sewage management system inspection and maintenance programs, stream frontage riparian buffers, and planning controls.) Major sewer overflows or sewage treatment plant failures into source water are reportable to the downstream water treatment plant operator. Supply may be sourced from a large or small reservoir or run of the river.(1) | The catchment area for the source water has multiple sources of faecal contamination from both human and agricultural activities. The inner catchment area is not protected and recreational activities (primary or secondary water contact) are permitted throughout the catchment or on any raw water storage that may be present. There are limited protection measures applied. |
Public access, such as for recreational activities | Land-based public access such as for recreation (camping, biking, four-wheel driving) in both the outer and inner catchment(2) (away from urban developments). May include water-based recreation on reservoirs. | ||||
Stock animals | Potentially high densities in both outer and inner catchment areas(2) (away from urban developments). There are sources of intensive animal husbandry (e.g. dairies, feedlots, piggeries) within the catchment area. |
(1) A large reservoir provides a storage barrier sufficient to achieve a several log10 reduction in pathogens as a result of settling, natural die off and dilution. Typically, this means the full storage volume of the reservoir is around 1 gigalitre (GL) and has a volume of at least the annual streamflow. Run of the river means water is drawn directly from a river prior to treatment.
(2) Terminology can vary, e.g. inner catchments can also be called “reservoir protection zones”. The demarcation between inner catchment and outer catchment varies. Typical surface water inner catchment reservoir protection zones, including feeder streams, within Australia are 2 to 3 km from reservoir highwater level.
(3) Refer to the Part IV information sheets for more information on turbidity limits for the different methods of disinfection.
Table 5.6
Treatment barriers | Validated LRVs1 | Basis for validation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Protozoa | Virus | Bacteria | ||
Conventional filtration: Coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation (or dissolved air flotation) and media filtration | 2.5-4 | 2 | 2 | Accepted industry norms.2 Performance depends on design, management and operational effectiveness and good supporting practices. On-line monitoring of filtered water turbidities; maintaining turbidities below defined critical limits measured by nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) (e.g. <0.2 NTU); minimising turbidity spikes and controlling filter backwash and recycling procedures are consistent with achieving higher LRVs. Lack of sedimentation in direct filtration reduces maximum removals by 0.5-1 LRV. |
Direct filtration: Coagulation, flocculation and media filtration | 2-3.5 | 1 | 1 | |
Microfiltration or ultrafiltration (MF/UF) | 4 | 0 | 4 | Published validation protocol.3 Maintaining individual filter turbidities below defined critical limits (e.g. ≤ 0.1 NTU). Daily Membrane Integrity Test (MIT) to manufacturer’s specification for the required LRV. UF typically achieves higher LRVs. |
Chlorine | 0 | 4 | 4 | Published inactivation data and validation protocol.4 Virus Bacteria For bacteria and viruses, a default of 15 mg.min/L is given as an acceptable value in the Guidelines (See also Information Sheet 1.3). |
Chloramine | 0 | 4 | 4 | Published inactivation data.6 Virus Bacteria (See also Information Sheet 1.4). |
Ultraviolet light disinfection (UV) | 4 | 4 | 4 | Published inactivation data and validation protocol.7 UV dose of 186 mJ/cm2 can provide 4 log inactivation of viruses and 22 mJ/cm2 can provide 4 log inactivation of protozoa and bacteria. (See also Information Sheet 1.7) |
Ozone | 4 | 4 | 4 | Published inactivation data and validation protocol.8 Virus Protozoa5 Bacteria5 (See also Information Sheet 1.6) |
Reverse osmosis (RO) |
1.5-2 2.5-4 |
1.5-2 2.5-4 |
1.5-2 2.5-4 | Published validation protocol.9 Validated LRVs limited by sensitivity of operational monitoring. Based on on-line operational monitoring of EC or TOC. Based on on-line or off-line operational monitoring of sulphate or fluorescent dyes. |
1 LRVs can only be claimed if meeting requirements described in published material or by certification against validation protocols (as cited for individual processes) (see Chapter 9 and Victorian Department of Health 2013).
2 USEPA 2006 (also see Turbidity Fact Sheet).
3 USEPA 2005.
4 Keegan et al. 2012 (see Information Sheet 1.3 “Disinfection with Chlorine”); WaterVal 2017a.
5 Concentration (C) and the corresponding disinfectant contact time (t) in minutes (C.t).
6 Keegan et al. 2012 (see Information Sheet 1.4 “Chloramines”).
7 (see Information Sheet 1.7 “Disinfection with Ultraviolet Light”); WaterVal 2017b.
8 (see Information Sheet 1.6 “Disinfection with Ozone”); Waterval 2017c.
9 Waterval 2017d.
Table 8.4
IMPURITY | Antimony | Arsenic | Barium | Cadmium | Chromium | Copper | Cyanide | Fluoride | Lead | Mercury | Nickel | Selenium | Silver | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHMRC Health-Based Guideline Value (mg/L) | 0.003 | 0.01 | 2 | 0.002 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.08 | 1.5 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.1 | ||
Treatment Chemical* | Chemical Strength (%) | Example doses (mg/L) | |||||||||||||
Aluminium chlorohydrate | 23 | 100 (as Al2O3) | 0.7 | 2.3 | 161 | 0.5 | 11.5 | 460 | 345 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 23 | |
Aluminium sulfate (Alum) | 47 | 20 (as Al2(SO4)3) | 7.1 | 23.6 | 1645 | 4.7 | 117.5 | 4700 | 3525 | 23.5 | 2.4 | 47 | 23.5 | 235 | |
Aluminium sulfate (Alum) | 47 | 60 (as Al2(SO4)3) | 2.4 | 7.9 | 548 | 1.6 | 39.2 | 1567 | 1175 | 7.8 | 0.8 | 15.7 | 7.8 | 78 | |
Aluminium sulfate (Alum) | 47 | 120 (as Al2(SO4)3) | 1.2 | 3.9 | 274 | 0.8 | 19.6 | 783 | 588 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 7.8 | 3.9 | 39 | |
Calcium hydroxide | 99 | 30 (as Ca(OH)2) | 33.0 | 2310 | 6.6 | 165 | 4950 | 33 | 3.3 | 66 | 33 | 330 | |||
Calcium hypochlorite | 65 | 3 (as Cl2) | 217.0 | 15167 | 43.3 | 1083.3 | 32500 | 216.7 | 21.7 | 433.3 | 216.7 | 2167 | |||
Calcium oxide | 10 | 500 (as CaO) | 0.1 | 14 | 0.04 | 1 | 30 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 2 | |||
Chlorine | 100 | 3 (as Cl2) | 333.3 | 333.3 | 33.3 | ||||||||||
Copper sulfate | 25.5 | 1 (as CuSO4.5H2O) | 255.0 | 255 | 510 | ||||||||||
Ferric chloride | 42 | 120 (as FeCl3) | 1.1 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 17.5 | 700 | 28 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 7 | 3.5 | 35 | ||
Ferric sulfate | 20 | 100 (as Fe2(SO4)3) | 0.6 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 1 | 400 | 16 | 2 | 0.2 | 4 | 2 | 20 | ||
Hydrochloric acid | 33 | 5 (as HCl) | 19.8 | 13.2 | 330 | 66 | 132 | ||||||||
Hydrofluorosilicic acid | 16 | 1.5 (as F) | 107.0 | 21.3 | 106.7 | ||||||||||
Hydroxylated ferric sulfate | 12.5 | 100 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 6.3 | 250 | 10 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 13 | ||
Polyaluminium chloride | 10 | 100 (as Al2O3) | 0.3 | 1.0 | 70 | 0.2 | 5 | 200 | 150 | 1 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 1 | 10 | |
Potassium permanganate | 99 | 1 (as KMnO4) | 198 | 4950 | 99 | ||||||||||
Sodium fluoride | 45 | 1.5 (as F) | 90 | 60 | 300 | ||||||||||
Sodium Fluorosilicate | 60 | 1.5 (as F) | 120 | 80 | |||||||||||
Sodium hydroxide | 50 | 10 (as NaOH) | 15 | 10 | 250 | 50 | 5 | 100 | |||||||
Sodium hypochlorite | 12 | 3 (as Cl2) | 8 | 4 | 80 | ||||||||||
Sulfuric acid | 98 | 5 (as H2SO4 ) | 58.8 | 196.0 | 13720 | 39.2 | 980 | 39200 | 29400 | 196 | 19.6 | 196 |
* Table includes recommended maximum impurity concentrations (RMIC) for selected drinking water chemicals. Further information on determining RMIC can be found in Box 8.3.
Table 9.3 Example of chlorination as a critical control point
Hazards
Enteric bacteria, viruses and Giardia
Process controls
- Chlorine dosing system
- Plant flow rate / operation of clear well storage
- pH adjustment
- Chlorine cylinder changeover
- Backup power / duplicate facilities
Operational monitoring
Characteristic | Target Criteria | Critical limits | Monitoring Methods |
---|---|---|---|
Chlorine residual | > 0.5 mg/L | Specific low chlorine residual set to achieve a minimum C.t requirement based on maximum flow and minimum storage times. Time is an important factor in determining the critical limit e.g. if there is a filtered water storage prior to supply to customers an interruption to chlorination of up to several hours may not result in the C.t value falling below the minimum limit. | Online, continuous chlorine residual analyser, flow and pH 24-hour monitored alarms on residual monitoring, pH and chlorine dosing equipment Regular turbidity and temperature monitoring, and chlorine demand calculations. Increase frequency on changing water quality Appropriate electronic or hard copy monitoring records |
pH | pH 6.5-7.5 | ||
Flow rate | Set to achieve minimum contact time | ||
Chlorine dose | Set points ± x% | ||
Turbidity | < 1.0 NTU | ||
Temperature |
Corrective action
Any breach in critical limits or target criteria should result in any of the following operating procedures as necessary:
- inspect and calibrate equipment
- adjust flow rate
- adjust chlorine dose or feed point
- carry out additional monitoring, increase sampling and testing
- recalculate C.t values
- implement unplanned maintenance procedure
- secondary or booster disinfection
- use alternative supply or divert water
- engage backup equipment
- plant automatic shutdown
- implement emergency response
- record actions to be taken and report (internally or externally as required).
Verification
- Calibration and maintenance of equipment
- Drinking water quality monitoring
- Consumer satisfaction
- Evaluation and audit
Table A1.9
Potential sources of Giardia | Preventative measures | Potential critical control pointsa | |
---|---|---|---|
River/weir Example of long-arrow-down at 6x | Septic tank effluent | Installation, design and maintenance standards Setback distances | |
Livestock waste | Riparian zones Stocking rate controls Stream fences
Flow diversion from reservoir of highly contaminated first-flush water following heavy rainfall |
Flow diversion | |
Reservoir | Human or livestock access | Restrict access Fencing Interception drains Detention | |
Treatment plant | Coagulation Sedimentation Filtration |
Filtration | |
Treatment plant | Disinfection, automatic dosing and monitoring | Disinfection | |
Distribution system | Cross-connections / backflows Mains breaks / new mains | Booster chlorination Cross-connection control Positive pressure Maintenance and repair protocols and procedures |
(one or more of the preventive |
a Determined using the critical control point decision tree
Table A1.11 Chlorination as a critical control point
Hazards
Enteric bacteria, viruses and Giardia
Process controls
- Chlorine dosing system
- Plant flow rate / operation of clear well storage
- pH adjustment
- Chlorine cylinder changeover
- Backup power / duplicate facilities
Operational monitoring
Parameter | Target Criteria | Critical limits | Monitoring Methods |
---|---|---|---|
Chlorine residual | > 0.5 mg/L | Specific low chlorine residual set to achieve a minimum C.t requirement based on maximum flow and minimum storage times. Time is an important factor in determining the critical limit e.g. if there is a filtered water storage prior to supply to customers an interruption to chlorination of up to several hours may not result in the C.t value falling below the minimum limit. | Online, continuous chlorine residual analyser, flow and pH 24-hour monitored alarms on residual monitoring, pH and chlorine dosing equipment Regular turbidity and temperature monitoring, and chlorine demand calculations. Increase frequency on changing water quality Appropriate electronic or hard copy monitoring records |
pH | pH 6.5-7.5 | ||
Flow rate | Set to achieve minimum contact time | ||
Chlorine dose | Set points ± x% | ||
Turbidity | < 1.0 NTU | ||
Temperature | Temperature will influence the required C.ta. |
a WaterVal 2017
Corrective action
Any breach in critical limits or target criteria should result in any of the following operating procedures as necessary:
- inspect and calibrate equipment
- adjust flow rate
- adjust chlorine dose or feed point
- carry out additional monitoring, increase sampling and testing
- recalculate C.t values
- implement unplanned maintenance procedure
- secondary or booster disinfection
- use alternative supply or divert water
- engage backup equipment
- plant automatic shutdown
- implement emergency response
- record actions to be taken and report (internally or externally as required).
Verification
- Calibration and maintenance of equipment
- Drinking water quality monitoring
- Consumer satisfaction
- Evaluation and audit